The policy framework for libraries, archives and museums has come together in several contexts, although actual services have not converged much. IMLS in the US, MLA in the UK, and other bodies have cross-domain responsibilities. I have just come back from visiting the newly formed Library and Archives Canada, but that is as yet an untypical organization.
I always think that the availability of good words for talking about something is a sign of acceptance and maturity. In this case we do not yet have good words. We have ‘memory institution’ or ‘memory organization’ (given currency here), or the vague ‘cultural institution’. We also have some acronyms (GLAM – galleries, libraries, archives, museums; ALMs; …) that are too twee to really use.
This in the context of an interesting paper by King and Hedstrom I have just come across which puts the development of Libraries, Archives and Muesums (which they call LAM) in an interesting perspective.
Share
Comments
So-called soft skills are hard
So-called soft skills are important across a range of library activities. Existing trends will further amplify this importance. Describing these skills as soft may be misleading, or even damaging. They should be recognized as learnable and teachable, and should be explicitly supported and rewarded.
12 min read
The technology career ladder
Library leaders should be drawn from across the organization. Any idea that technology leaders are overly specialised or too distant from general library work is outmoded and counter-productive.
7 min read
Calgary Central Library: combining intimacy and civic statement
The Calgary central library was on first impression the finest public building I have been in for years.
3 min read
