Systems

FRBResque

Lorcan 1 min read

In recent discussion, an RLG colleague used the word ‘FRBResque’ to describe its rolling up of results into a work-level view. A very nice expression, I thought.
And appropriate too. It is important to remember that wherever its (slow) formal elaboration goes, we do not currently have something called FRBR which can be implemented out of the box. Nor will it yield an approach devoid of ambiguity or the need for discretion in application. Nor is it clear what impact it will have on cataloging practice or what level of deployment there will be.
The main current advantage is the framework it gives us for thinking about developing work-based views which are ‘roughly right’. It also provides a conceptual framework for thinking about our practices in terms of the broad data entities to be managed in bibliographic systems. And for comparing those practices and entities to those of other domains and our own evolving needs.

Share
Comments
More from LorcanDempsey.net
Two metadata directions
Systems

Two metadata directions

Metadata practice continues to evolve as research and cultural practices diversify. After a brief environmental view, I discuss two important metadata trends here: entification and pluralization.
Lorcan 16 min read
icon

Follow along

Deep dives and quick takes. Libraries, society, culture, technology, ...

Great! You’ve successfully signed up.

Welcome back! You've successfully signed in.

You've successfully subscribed to LorcanDempsey.net.

Success! Check your email for magic link to sign-in.

Success! Your billing info has been updated.

Your billing was not updated.