Institutions

Library collections viewed systemically

Lorcan Dempsey 1 min read

OCLC Research has been doing quite a bit of work on collection analysis in the last couple of years: mining Worldcat for management intelligence about the characteristics of libary collections.
One strand of this work was reported at the recent CNI meeting under the title ‘A System-Wide View of Library Collections’. This is work carried out by my colleague Brian Lavoie and Roger Schonfeld of Ithaka. [abstract] [ppt]
The purpose here is to analyse a subset of WorldCat (broadly ‘books’: the detail is in the ppt) to see what can be said about the aggregate characteristics of library collections over time. The analysis ended up focusing on 32M records.
Some standout preliminary findings for me:

  • Half of all books held were published after 1977
  • 82% of books were published in 1923 or afterwards. 18% were published before 1923. In other words, the larger part of library collections is of in-copyright materials.
  • ‘rareness’ is more common than was expected. Only 33% of records have more than 5 holdings. I like to think about this by saying that library collections are less ‘vanilla’ than was expected. This requires further analyis as it has implications for systemwide preservation moving forward.

We are looking at other strands of work also. One study is looking at the characteristics of items held uniquely by a library for example The motivating factor for us is how interest in this intelligence is growing as research libraries and others begin to think about how they will manage a growing bookstock in a changing environment.
Incidentally, OCLC has also just released its new collection analysis service.
All part of making data work harder!

Share
More from LorcanDempsey.net
The informational disciplines
Institutions

The informational disciplines

This is a further excerpt from my response to the LIS Forward paper. It considers some of the history and contours of the informational disciplines - information science, LIS, library studies. It notes the ongoing blurriness of identity, nomenclature and boundaries.
Lorcan Dempsey 20 min read
icon

Lorcan Dempsey dot Net

Organizational, technical and social contexts of libraries

Great! You’ve successfully signed up.

Welcome back! You've successfully signed in.

You've successfully subscribed to LorcanDempsey.net.

Success! Check your email for magic link to sign-in.

Success! Your billing info has been updated.

Your billing was not updated.