Wikipedia and reputation
Ross Mayfield summarises current discussions about the ‘trustworthiness’ of Wikipedia.
More from LorcanDempsey.net
Which brings me to an lingering thought — that explicitly codifying reputation introduces a cost which can constrain commons-based peer production. Wikipedia was never supposed to work, somehow does because of good club theory and transaction costs, and has gained a reputation as a resource. Introducing reputation for contributors or articles is the greatest risk to the Wikipedia community. Getting a base study on factual accuracy can help inform this decision as well as educate the public on how to use and participate with this commons resource. [Many-to-Many: Wikipedia Reputation and the Wemedia Project]
Not very many blogs end up as books. This one did!
1 min read
It is important to know what you know, so that you can avoid the curse of knowledge and communicate effectively.
7 min read
St Valentine's Day. What are the most popular love stories? Taking library holdings as a proxy for popularity.
1 min read
Deep dives and quick takes. Libraries, society, culture, technology, ...
Sign in / up